Communication Between Agencies Essay Example for Free

Communication Between Agencies EssayIn order to be successful having great communication is the key to that success. Our country has endowed more tragedies with many of them due to the poor communication. Many lives had been lost because of poor communication or the first responders not being trained right on for a situation as this. Communication problems became the focal point of our nations emergency management improvement ever since September 11. Every sidereal day in cities and towns across the Nation, emergency response personnel respond to incidents of varying scope and magnitude. Their ability to communicate in real time is critical to establishing prevail and control at the scene of an emergency, to maintaining event situational awareness, and to operating overall within a broad range of incidents (National emergency communications, 2008). Communicating messages to the general populace is a critical yet underdeveloped aspect of effective emergency management. Such m essages fall under three basic categories risk, communication, and warning and crisis communications.Risk communication involves warning signal and educating the public to the risks they face and how they can best prepare for and mitigate these risks in order to reduce the impacts of future incident events. Warning involves delivering notice of an actual impend threat with sufficient time to allow recipient individuals and communities to take shelter, evacuate, or take other mitigated action in advance of a disaster event. Crisis communication involves the provision of timely, useful, and accurate teaching to the public during the response and recovery phases of a disaster event (Bullock, 2009).The emergency management community as a whole has vast experience in practicing risk and warning communications. Preparedness programs have been an active part of emergency management in this country for decades, and public education programs conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the American Red Cross, the Salvation Army, local fire departments, and other public and private field agencies have disseminated millions of brochures and checklists describing the risks of future disaster events and the steps that individuals and communities can take to reduce and prepare for them (Bullock, 2009).In our text Bullock States, The National Commission on terrorist attacks on the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, found that inadequate communications contributed greatly to hindering the ability of responding agencies to respond to the events that unfolded, and led this instant to the high number of police and fire department employees who were killed when the towers collapsed (Bullock, 2009).From this you can conclude that information was not passed along fast enough so as a result many people lost their lives because of this. There were also language barriers many of the different agencies did not use the same lingo and because of this confusion information was not passed between them correctly.

Sexual Education in Schools

energizeual Education in SchoolsSexual schooldaysing ( charge ed) in normal schools has long been a controversial and debated topic in society. There are several questions when it lists to starting elicit ed in schools. These questions include appropriate age for introducing sex ed should sex ed be mandatory or favorional and whether sex ed programs should be comprehensive or abstinence-based. Sex ed is a needful subject to teach in schools. It should be appropriate to the grade level and taught in a familiarityable, unbiased manner. Comprehensive sex ed should include learn students intimately abstinence, stripe techniques, and should practice an emphasis on helping students to acquire decision-making skills when it comes to cozy activity. Sex ed can be a very usable and efficient tool for schoolgirlish students when it comes to making the decision that is best for them. It is an unfortunate trend that not all boylike adolescents fool a bun in the oven a safe pla ce to turn to for effective inner information. Providing sex ed in schools gives all students an equal opportunity to get information to the highest degree sex and all the aspects that come with it.Age-Appropriate Sex EdSex education should begin in early adolescents or sooner, possibly starting in 5th or 6th grade. Sex education that works starts early, before young people reach puberty, and before they nurse developed established patterns of behavior (Forrest Kannabus, 2009, pg 3). If a child doesnt get introduced to sex ed until age 16, but starts having sex at age 14 then its possible they didnt learn anything to the highest degree abstinence and STD or pregnancy prevention prior to their sexual activity. At which point it may be harder to teach them new behaviors concerning sexual activity. In 2005, 6.2 percent of high school students reported having industrious in sexual relation before age 13 (Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS), 2007, n.p.). While 6.2 may se em like a small percent 45.5% of young women and 45.7% of young men claim to have had sexual intercourse between the ages of 15 and 19. accord to these statistics, it would appear that some sex ed would be appropriate at least prior to or at age 12. It is difficult to know at what age sex ed should be administered. It all depends on the physical, emotional, and mental development of the child. Some fence that introducing sex ed at such a young age give encourage young kids to experiment and act on their curiosity. However,According to 48 studies of comprehensive sex and STD/HIV education programs in US schools there was piece to be strong render that such programs did not enlarge sexual activity. Some of them reduced sexual activity, or increased rates of condom mathematical function or other contraceptives, or both (Forrest Kannabus, 2009).It appears to be evident that providing sexual education at a younger age, such as 5th or 6th grade, is not only necessary but appropria te as well.Mandatory vs. Optional Sex EdBeca exercise all students deserve the opportunity to have equal access to sex ed it should be mandated by all schools to teach comprehensive sexual education, with the option for parents opting their children out of class. During interviews conducted with parents of school aged children, by the author of this paper it was found that all the parents also thought sex ed should be mandatory for schools to teach sex ed, and mandatory for schools to offer parents the quality of opting their children out of the programs. The parents also thought it necessary for schools to allow parents to review the information that would be taught to students prior to their children taking the course, this would give them the opportunity to pull their children out of the course. According to the Guttmacher Institute (2009), 21 states and the District of Columbia mandate that common schools teach sex education (highlight 1). While 37 states enquire school distr icts to allow parental involvement in sex ed, only 3 states require parental consent for their child to participate in sex ed, and 35 states permit parents to opt their children out of sex ed (Guttmacher Institute, 2009, highlight 3). Only 4% of junior high students parents and 6% of high school student parents believe that sex education should not be taught in schools. Many school districts do however perk up exceptions for students that cannot participate due to religious beliefs and customs (Sexuality Information and Education Council of the joined States (SIECUS), 2007, n.d.).Program EffectivenessEven though there seems to be little debate about the appropriate age to introduce sex ed and whether it should be mandatory or optional there is a very big debate about the effectiveness of the two main programs being taught in public schools. These programs include comprehensive sexual education and abstinence-only programs, both of which have supporters and opponents.Many abstinenc e-until-marriage or abstinence-based programs taught in schools are funded by the federal government. Billions of dollars have been poured into these programs, yet they have not been proven to be as effective as comprehensive programs nor have they shown a positive change in young students sexual activities (No to a greater extent Money, 2008).Abstinence-only programs place an emphasis on abstinence from all sexual behaviors as a means to prevention of pregnancy and STDs. These programs cover minimal information about contraceptives and STD prevention. If discussed at all, these programs only discuss failure rates (Community Action Kit, 2008). While many proponents of abstinence-only programs argue that the program is the only way for students to be 100% protected, opponents would argue that the programs dont supply abundant knowledge to students about other forms of protection and preventative measures. Students are more likely to engage in unprotected sexual activities when they have not been taught any information about prevention. Many abstinence-only programs also teach students about exercising self-control (No More Money, 2008). According to Family Accountability Communicating teenaged Sexuality (FACTS Handbook) (2000), Students who do not choose to exercise self-control to remain abstinent are not likely to exercise self-control in the use of a contraceptive device (p. 50). However, this is not a known fact since contraception as a preventative device is not taught in abstinent-only programs.Abstinent-only programs do not prepare students for the possibility that they may not be able to exercise self-control. Educational Psychology by John W. Santrock highlights adolescent thinking, on foliate 314. Santrock notes that in the heat of the moment, adolescents emotions may especially overwhelm their decision-making ability. In the heat of the moment, a student who hasnt been taught about contraception or condoms probably wont make the right decision. H owever, an adolescent who has been supplied with adequate information about condoms and contraception might have already considered the consequences before-hand, during a moment not aroused by emotion. Having the knowledge to make the right decision concerning protection may help the young student to make a better choice during an emotionally aroused state.The evidence and research clearly shows that abstinence-only programs do not prevent teen pregnancies or the onset of vaginal intercourse (Kohler, 2008).Comprehensive sexual education (CSE) is an unbiased approach to sex ed. CSE teaches and develops decision-making skills in students about abstinence, contraceptives, STD prevention, condom use, teen pregnancy, human development and reproductive systems and relationships (Community Action Kit, 2008, pgId 886). Many parents argued that sexual education programs did not focus enough on teaching students responsible behavior and self-esteem associated with making decisions about sex. CSE provides that students be taught about relationships and interpersonal skills. This program also highlights the development of students attitudes towards their values and beliefs about sex and exercising responsibility regarding sexual relationships (Community Action Kit, 2008, pgId 888). Even though these programs have been proven to delay the onset of intercourse reduce the frequency of intercourse and the number of sexual partners and increase condom or contraceptive use (Community Action Kit, 2008, pgId887) only 15 states require that sex education programs cover contraception (Guttmacher Institution, 2009, highlight 1.2). Even with its proven effectiveness and success rate, CSE is not being taught in enough schools to reach its max potential at reducing young students risky behavior concerning sexual activities.Some critics argue that CSE programs increase sexual activity due simply to the students awareness of sexual information. While CSE may not primarily prevent sexual intercourse it is 50% more likely to prevent teen pregnancies than abstinence-only programs. It is also shown to marginally reduce reports of vaginal intercourse among young students (Kohler, 2008). CSE allows students to continually build upon development and learned skills. It also focuses on helping students to maintain these skills in memory, thinking and decision-making processes. For CSE to be successful, educators have to be dedicated in providing students with unbiased and effective sexual knowledge and information. There are many young adolescents in societys communities that are just not provided with the adequate knowledge about sex ed necessary to make choices and decisions that are best for themselves and their futures. With the right tools and motivation teachers and educators could be very successful at preparing students for real life sexual encounters.Parents in America strongly support a wide breadth of topics being taught as a part of sex education, and there is broad public support as well. 93% of junior high parents and 91% of high school parents support sex education as a part of school curriculum. 71% up to 100% of junior high and high school parents support topics such as HIV/AIDS, STD prevention, teen pregnancy, birth control, condom use, and sexual orientation as appropriate topics to discuss in sexual education programs (SIECUS, 2007). Even with these high numbers its alarming to know that many states just dont require it.Many more states need to require that comprehensive sex education be offered in all schools, rather than no sex education or abstinence-only programs. They need to be mandatory programs with the option of opt outs. Programs should start at age-appropriate times such as 5th-6th grade, and each grade level provided with age-appropriate material to increase in intensity in higher grade levels. Only when this approach is taken will sexual education in schools see max potential and effective results. Effective results t hat just may change those 6% of opposing parents minds.

Assessing Selective Human Genetic Engineering

Assessing Selective Human Genetic EngineeringNora SheskeySelective Genetic EngineeringFor millions of years, ancestral infusion has been the result of subjective selection. Who some one and only(a) is, natural abilities, physical characteristics, and a wide range of other personal attributes were the result of familial recombination and accidental mutation. Furthermore, children atomic number 18 truly much born with hereditary conditions which are set by factors we assume no control over. However, the approach of modern medicine has brought us to the brink of a fourth dimension when we disregard choose to redirect nature and repair maladies in children, where we sack artificially modify the very codes which guide their looks, which diseases they are resistant to, and even their personalities. Considering the facts concerning constituenttic engineering, the benefits which deal be achieved far out(a)weigh the potential risks with regard to both the reduction in tender suf fering and the likely increase in lifespan.The opponents of homo genetic engineering often refer to a number of dangers concern in artificially manipulating genetic codes which result in much(prenominal) medical issues as Downs syndrome, Hemophilia, and even anxiety and stress. With the completion of the Genome project, we bunghole now more accurately map the human desoxyribonucleic acid than ever before, identifying the locations of defects that cause many an(prenominal) of the maladies that have plagued mankind for millennia. Opponents of genetic manipulation are quick to point out that a slight error in the manipulation process can result in changing other sequences that could result in unforeseen and undesired effects. For instance, researcher Russell Powell has reflectd that human genetic engineering might result in a lower genetic diversity which could lead to proximo generations that are more prone to having some types of diseases and which could, potentially, lead to the human race get extinct. case of his research showed how genetic manipulation of crops in order to increase the availability of desirable crops increased the likelihood of catastrophic crop failure callable to those crops becoming less genetically diverse over magazine and having reduced resistance to environmental factors which a wider genetic base would have prevented. He studied how much(prenominal) factors led to the nineteenth century Irish Potato Famine and how the organism Phytophthora was able to decimate much of the potato crop in Ireland due to this reduction in genetic diversity because of the farming methods in use in that region during that period of history. His research demonstrates that by reducing human genetic diversity through much(prenominal) techniques as genetic manipulation those human beings could set themselves up for a similar fate (Powell, R. 2012, pp. 204-5). Also, the work of Charles Gillespie, et. al., into how genetics cloak the human stress response found that stress related genetic mutations in developing human fetuses increased the individuals susceptibility to disorders such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder later in life. They found that natural genetic manipulation due to a change in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal equilibrize lead to an increase in susceptibility to stress related disorders in the associated human beings (Gillespie, C. F., 2009, p. 990). Opponents of genetic manipulation point out that accidentally manipulating the incorrect gene sequences could result in the same type of condition. Opponents use facts such as these in their outspoken aversion to the practice.Proponents of genetic engineering rebut the opponents by pointing out that the benefits of curing medical issues like Downs syndrome and Hemophilia far outweigh the possible risks. They counter the opposition with a number of research studies. As part of his research, Powell determined that human genetic diversity is due t o a combination of both mutation and recombination (Powell, R. 2012, pp. 215). He found that a number of distinguishable phenotypes can result from a single genotype which led him to conclude that accidental activation of inactive or incorrect sequences is unlikely to produce feared hammy issues often spoken of by human genetic manipulation opponents. Additionally, he found that focusing on only DNA adaptive variation involved in human genetic manipulation would not result in an extensive homogenization of the human DNA feared by opponents and that other environmental factors do work a significant part in human genetic diversity (Powell, R. 2012, pp. 207-8). In addition, Gordon and Hen found that properly utilized genetic manipulation can provide many useful results with an acceptable margin of safety. They studied twins to determine how anxiety response is genetically associated and how DNA sequencing and correction could help to goody the condition. They document that comparis ons of fraternal and identical twins showed that 30% to 50% of risk of developing anxiety disorders comes from genetic factors with the remainder being attributed to environmental causes. They excessively use studies of rats and mice to show that anxiety is a genetic condition and could be treatable using genetic manipulation techniques (Gordon, J. A., Hen, R., 2004, pp. 195-6)Opponents of human genetic engineering further turn to natural selection in their opposition to the practice. They point out that altering how nature and evolution have brought things about can have unintended consequences. As state of this, they look at the research of Richard A. Miller. Miller found that manipulating certain genes associated with aging in what he refers to as UM-HET3 mice, a group of 1800 specimens, sometimes actually weakened rather than lengthened the aver historic period lifespan as well as hastened the onset of reduced cognitive abilities in the mice which received such treatments. H e additionally found that when other specific genetic sequences were modified, the result was an increase in the occurrence of and age at which cancer occurred in some cases. His research likewise showed that not only could the aging process be sped up due to genetic manipulation but could also increase the severity of old age issues. Additionally, some of the traits which occurred later in life could not be detected in the early stages of life. Miller found that these traits affected a number of aspects such as bones, eyes, hormones, weight, and what kills the individual. Miller eventually admits that there are things which nature has brought about which we cannot yet reproduce in the laboratory and opponents of genetic manipulation question if such research is expenditure the risks (Miller, R.A., 2005, pp.S284-5) Opponents of genetic engineering also refer to the work of Brown who examined that practice from a viewpoint of Rawlsian Justice. He points out that such a practice st ill needs to be considered from both a moral and a legal framework. He states that The important point is that until now, theories of justice have regarded ones genetic endowment as a fixed fact of nature rather than as a matter of justice. He indicates that manipulating individuals alters their right to have an equal claim to the same equalities and fair equalities as others. The opponents of genetic manipulation take the viewpoint that altering who has what rights is inherently wrong and does not actually mend the overall human condition (Brown, 2007, pp. 83-84)Proponents of human genetic engineering, on the other hand, believe that we, as human beings, are finally able to improve on that which nature has brought about after millions of years of evolution. They point out that nature has evolved such things as cancer and shortened lifespans in their support for genetic manipulation. They also look to the work of Miller and say that in spite of some cases where the lifespan was ind eed shortened that in many other cases the lifespan is so far longer. Their viewpoint is that by performing an analysis of the differences between DNA of the long and short lived mice that researchers will be able to eventually track down which genes do lead to longer lives. Miller himself states that there are genes which influence the age at which the various mice die, such as a pair of genes on chromosomes 2 and 16, which lead to mice living up to 173 days longer than mice that do not have this particular DNA sequence. Likewise, Miller states that there are also DNA sequences which also affect the age at which certain cancers occur in some of the mice in his study. He goes on to say that his research indicates that there may be a specific aging process that we can learn enough about to modify or prevent. Miller ends his paper by stating give genetic manipulation or pharmacologic agents suggested by genetic research offer a realistic possibility of life expectancy at have got of 110 or 120 or more years? Twenty years ago, this was a science fiction question, but no more, and it is interesting to speculate based on current usher. I believe the answer is yes. (Miller, R.A., 2005, pp. S284-5)After having examined information from both those opposed to and those in favor of human genetic manipulation, we can most certainly say that both sides have some strong arguments in favor of their viewpoints. Those opposed to the practice would await to come from a traditionalistic perspective, fearing the changes necessary in order to make the necessary strides that will be required in order to bring about substantial gains to be established from genetic engineering. Taking history as a guiding principle, they see how the best intentions often result in severe negative results before gains can be realized. They see in the work of researchers like Gordon and Hen, Miller, Powell, and Gillespie the back offing to state that the possible gains are either not possible or are not warranted by the necessary costs that will be trimd. The proponents of the practice of human genetic engineering believe that any time we can relieve human suffering and eradicate disease that the benefits outweigh the costs. They are motivated by the belief that any change which improves the human condition is worth the risks and that any time we can repair genetic defects that we are doing humanity a much needed service, even when that service means that we alter the very codes which determine who a person is. They acknowledge the risks posed but believe that a future without birth defects, without Downs syndrome, and without other such genetically linked issues is worth risking for. They find in the works of Miller, Powell, Gillespie, and Gordon and Hen an exciting roadmap to a world where human suffering based on the genetic structure has been eliminated.Personally, I am inclined to agree with those who say that we must go boldly forward and take the necessary risks in order to improve the human condition in every way possible. History has shown us that such journeys are not without risk but almost always inevitably prove beneficial to future generations. If we are to let fear guide us, we would have never developed such medical miracles as penicillin, the polio vaccine, or the heart transplant. No valorous effort in human history has ever come without costs and moving forward with research in genetic manipulation is sure to impose upon mankind the same kinds of costs imposed by the research of Pasteur, Salk, and Fleming. Mankind has never been the type to simply not advance and the next frontier would appear to be human genetic engineering.In conclusion, we have finally come to an age in human history where we can choose to modify the very codes that define who we are and how we develop. We can decide whether to allow such disorders as Downs syndrome, Hemophilia, and severe anxiety to continue to plague the human race. The advent of modern m edicine has brought us to the brink of a time when we can choose to redirect nature and repair maladies in children, modifying the very codes which guide their looks, which diseases they are resistant to, and even their personalities. The opponents of genetic manipulation believe that the risks involved far outweigh the potential gains. The proponents believe that we cannot let fear hold us back from improving the human condition in any way we can. So, considering the facts concerning genetic engineering, we can at this point say that based on the research and evidence at hand, the benefits which can be achieved far outweigh the potential risks with regard to both the reduction in human suffering and the likely increase in lifespan.Works CitedBrown, J. S. (2001). Genetic Manipulation in Humans as a Matter of Rawlsian Justice. Social Theory and Practice, 27(1), 83-110.Gillespie, C. F, Gillespie, J, Phifer, B, et al. (2009). Risk and resilience Genetic and environmental influences on development of the stress response. Depression and anxiety (1091-4239), 26(11), 984-992.Gordon, J. A., Hen, R. (2004). Genetic Approaches to the Study of Anxiety. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 193-222.Miller, R A. (2005). Genetic Approaches to the Study of Aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53S284-S286.Powell, R. (2012). The evolutionary Biological Implications of Human Genetic Engineering. Journal of Medicine Philosophy, 37(3), 204-225.

Kretchmars Five Types Of Dualism

Kretchmars Five Types Of DualismThe classical emphasis emerged from one of the most renowned Greek philosophers dialogue, Platos Phaedo. Plato believed that the most important things ar not the material or physical entities but the eternal Forms. He also stated that the bodies and physical matters argon just imperfect replicas of such Forms. Aristotle, one of Platos students did not believe in the Platonic Forms. Aristotle argued that the body is far to a greater extent important than the take heed and the soul (the mind) do not exist. His forms are the billet of things and the things existing in those things. This made it easier for Aristotle to explain the body and soul union by saying that the soul is nothing more(prenominal) than form of the body. Due to this reasoning, by Aristotle arguments the soul is something material because it is a property of the body. Aristotle argument and theory led to many interpreters, ancient and modern, to interpret Aristotle theory as materia listic.The more modern version of dualism has their origin and is associated Rene Descartes Meditations. Descartes was known to be a substance dualist. He states that there are two types of substance, the matter which the essential property is spatially extended and the mind which is the essential property that do the thinking.In very recent history, Scott Kretchmar divided Descartes dualism into five lovelys. These five mercifuls areSubstance reputeKnowledgeLanguageBehaviourSubstance DualismSubstance is at the heart of the dualistic thinking and practise. Dualists argue that the mind (soul) and the body are two radically different things.The body is seen just wish another object, it is like on the same level of a football, water and rocks. When we see the body from this perspective, the body substructure be apply, manipulated, dissected and treated like any other object. Since the body is seen as an object, then the body is just a machine made of joints which persist using th e levers and force. Like any other physical object the body obey and use the laws of physics.The substance dualists also ac intimacy thinking. Thought is not like the matter. Matter has shape, colour and obey laws. Thinking or the mind or the soul does not have colour, size, form or shape and do not observe physics laws. The mind obeys the logic rules and coherence.Substance dualism does ac noesis that the body and mind interact. These dualists also acknowledge that the body go the mind and vice versa. age the connection between the mind and the body is very difficult to explain, but through scientific experiments and personal experience the body and the mind do affect each other.Value DualismValue dualism grounded deep in substance dualism. Value dualists see the human as being the mind and the body.Plato placed the thoughts, perfection and ideas all over the body, above the mediocrity and emotions. Plato continued his theoretical argument that the body at its best serve as a co mpliment to the mind and helping the mind to acquire more intellect and knowledge. At the same time, he stated that at worst the body ordain hinder the mind from gather more knowledge due to our carnal nature and desire. If this happens, it will be the source of our animal instinct, emotion disturbance and perceptual errors and then peak result will be pain and death.Plato stated that our physical senses may perceive things in a defile way and therefore our senses will transmit to the mind wrong messages and the knowledge transmitted can be negatively influencing the mind.Value dualists value the mind over the body, with the body being the source of all evil. But this get on some questions, such as, does all the evil come from the body? Im sodding(a) thoughts, such as, excessive anger and greed does not disturb the acquisition of knowledge? Is this evil which originated and circulated in the mind without any help from the body?Knowledge DualismKnowledge dualism is divided into tw o categories, the knowing and the knowing how. The knowing is pure knowledge, pure understanding of things. The knowledge of why some things work better than others, why things occur in such a way and order. Knowledge of why we tone better after a good session of training, why our cardiovascular system improves in functionality with regular training.The knowledge of knowing how is purely procedural. This kind of knowledge help people and athletes perform better skills. A great football player can kick the ball with so meticulousness that if he is read how he did it he wont be able to explain what he did. The player will be at a level of knowledge of beef the ball that for him it will be hard to explain the complexity of the angle of the foot, the power in the kick and the position of the supporting leg. This happens because it so natural for him to do that and cannot explain why and how.People with this kind of dualism do not really understand what they are doing and this will com promise the value of accomplishments.Behaviour DualismGilbert Ryle in his book The Concept of Mind describes behaviour dualism is a type of value dualism because it climaxes the requirement of the body as a machine and the mind as an operator.This kind of dualism suggests that all actions has a dual process. The process of thinking followed by the process of doing. These dualists beliefs are similar to the valuelists because they believe that since the body is only a machine it pitch function on its own. Therefore since the body is only a machine, it must awaits for commands from the mind.The behavioural dualism point of view is that the mind and the body are in an wild relationship where the body depends totally on the mind.Language DualismLanguage dualism is similar to the behaviour dualism and is considered as a value type dualism. This kind of dualism focuses on symbolisation focuses on an image or an action and such action or images stand for something else.According to Ernst Cassirer in his book Philosophy of Symbolic Form (1944), the attainment of using symbols is what makes us human beings. This is also considered as a trademark for human beings and this hallmark distinguishes us from all the other lower life forms.This kind of dualism is divided into two major groups, intellectual and non-intellectual. The intellectual group consists of poems, prose and other writing and spoken form. This group also include any mathematical symbols used in physics and other sciences. Since these are considered intellectual, these factors are at the heart of most of IQ tests, SRT and other intelligence and academic testing. These are used because they are considered as they are thought to show the mind workings at its best.The other group is the non-intellectual. Paintings, music and sports are found under this category. Because these form fate of the non-intellectual group, these are given a lesser academic rating and importance.

Ahab and Unas Incestuous Relationship in Naslunds Novel, Ahabs Wife :: Naslund Ahabs Wife Essays

Ahab and Unas Incestuous Relationship in Naslunds Novel, Ahabs WifeThe incestuous reputation of story telling which is featured in Ahabs wife is reminiscent of the Anne Sextons poem, Briar Rose. Una is in a constant search for sustenance. Her mind as cannot exist without the consent of learning and engulfing knowledge. As a child, it was the occupation of her father to appease her insatiable appetite. This was done with stories and the boundless possibilities she was allowed to find within the recesses of her mind. As time progresses and Una grew, her father started to oral sex the conclusions and presumptions that these internal scavenger hunts were building within her. Una could never understand why Ulysses, her father, did not take out his aggression on her mother, who was also a nonbeliever. She remained unconverted. wherefore did his wrath not fall upon her? (Naslund 21). But as his daughter Ulysses was looking for something which he could never truly hope to find in his wif e. Just as the king in the Briar Rose Ulysses would have force every male in the court/to scour his tongue with Bab-o/ lest they poison the air she dwelt in/ thus she dwelt in his odor./ ( Sexton he wanted to have her mind in his hands for his molding. He was looking for reflective surface from which he could esteem his story, or at lest the story which he has come to tell himself. This story consisted of many parts all of which would then be combined to create his individualism and the life he had built for himself. By not being able to convert Una, there by making her believe his story as true, Ulysses has to admit to failure. non only does she prove his story incorrect, but she also reflects the entire make-up and construction of it as being flawed. This flaw becomes magnified by Unas intellect. By having the index to continually question what her father hold as infallible she destroys the constructed image of the man he though he was. Children are to be impressionable and e asy persuaded. As a father Ulysses want to share a special bond with his daughter as she mirrors his believes through her everyday life and thinking. As individual who is indifferent to his teachings and ideology he feels that he has failed as a father. Even if Una had disagreed with his teachings, it would be preferable to enticing no emotion.

Our Political Candidate Should Support Abortion Essay -- Politics Poli

Our Political Candidate Should Support Abortion It is very difficult for the two opposing sides in the heated debate of the fairness of abortion to obtain eye to eye. This is mainly because the two sides, who live in the same country, convey, cities, and neighborhoods live in all together polar worlds. Your neighbor that you see out every day playing with their dogs, washing their cars, and mowing their lawn may live in an exactly opposite world. Are they married? How many children do they conduct? Are they male or female? What is their job like? Do they take hold a job? College education? Do they attended a church, synagogue, another(prenominal) place of worship, or none at all? As it tramp be seen, people who live in the same country, have the same president, can lead entirely different lives and have entirely different views on the world. It is the governments job to make laws that appeal to both sides, and protect the elementary rights of all of its citizens. This make s the legality of abortion debate so very divisive as abortion and its legality mean many different things to many different people. (Luker) The key issues are as vast and different as the people who hold an opinion on the topic of abortion. The case of Palko v. Connecticut (Roe vs. wade) was the first to draw a right to privacy. Using this same notion of a right to privacy, in 1973 the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Roe v. Wade that a woman has a right to privacy in the medical procedure of abortion. This right to privacy according to the court means that she can have an abortion at anytime in any method she deems fit. This case though did allow for the state to impose limits on the right to an abortion as the state sees fit. (Roe v. Wade). For other people, the abor... ...scholarly primary, print, authoritativeTumulty, Karen A Test of Kerrys Faith Time Magazine April 5, 2004Popular news, print via internet, reputableWallace, James. Abortion isnt Life, Liberty, or Ha ppiness July 11 1998 http//www.godlessprolifers.org/library/wallace2.htmlunrestricted, print modified, plausibleWilcox Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes Some Additional Evidence The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 2. (Summer, 1990), pp. 248-255. unchangeable URL http//links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-362X%28199022%2954%3A2%3C248%3ARDIAAS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0Scholarly primary print via internet reputableWilke Why Cant We Love Them Both? On Line Book(c) 1998 heritage House 76, Inc. Chapter 10http//www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_lo ve_them_both_preface.aspUnrestricted print via Internet apparently credible

Essay --

.HSGM 371ProfessorFinal Paper Vicie RichNovember 9, 2013Table of circumscribeTitle Page1Table of Contents2Introduction/Identified Problem3Literature Review4Cost5Type chapter title (level 3)6Final study Identify a work-related topic/issue/problem (or a real-life problem in the treatment of healthc ar focusing on access, quality, and/or cost) and write a final paper 6-8 pages, in APA format with a title page, table of contents, introduction, , literature review, discussion, solution/recommendation, conclusion, and reference page (title page, table of contents, and reference page do not count in the 6-8 pages). The outcome is to discuss the pros and cons of that topic and your recommendation of a better solution that will improve healthcare delivery at your institution.Introduction I would like to examine some of the reasons for the frequent ER hospital readmissions for post-surgery patients within a 30 day period. There has been a advanced rate of post-surgery patients returning to the emergency room within 30 days after discharge. Identified problemThere are several incidents when my sister was seen in the Emergency Room, treated and released and then hospitalized within 30 days after having major surgery. In August 2012, she was diagnosed with a second round of breast genus Cancer and had a mastectomy of the right breast. She had multiple complications (hematoma, elevated blood sugar, and allergic reaction to a medication given in the hospital and infection) with this surgery which required the readmission. I spoke several times to her physician about a longer hospital stay because of her existing illnesses but was told that it was up to the insurance company to flattery the additional hospital inpatient da... ...entered Outcomes Research Institute would be the perfect medium to open the eyes of rationers. Republicans and Democrats would both agree that health costs are spiraling out of control. Ultimately, there are only two ways to lower costs. One ap proach empowers and incentivizes patients to be smarter health care consumers. This entails solutions such as expanding health savings accounts, creating a national market for health insurance, and leveling the tax playing field. These could bend the cost curve down and strengthen the patient-doctor relationship. The giving medication shunned this approach.My recommendation is that Congress should take a closer look at Medicare, Medicaid and the insurance companies to access what is best for the patients recovery post-surgery. They should become to a greater extent patient-centered, focusing on preventative care and health literacy.